Home / Fall 2011 / College invades students’ rights

College invades students’ rights

Students at Linn State Technical College were met with a new and unnecessary drug testing policy on Sept 7. The tests will be included in student fees at a cost of $50 and will test for 11 drugs, including marijuana, cocaine and methamphetamine.

Even if it is a technical college, using a drug test to determine whether someone should be able to attend school is creating a barrier to education that has nothing to do with a person’s ability to excel in a particular career specialization.

Instead of using that money to pay for drug tests, the money could be used towards improving other aspects of the school. I think some of the fees that students already have to pay are unnecessary and just a way for the school to get more money.

“I don’t think colleges should use drug screens on students for admissions,” Aerolyn Shaw, senior public relations major, said. “It would lengthen the admissions process as well as possibly increase the application fee among other fees.”

According to school leaders, the tests are necessary for student safety since some coursework includes aircraft maintenance.

According to Alan Zagier, writer for the Huffington Post, the decisions to invoke this policy have rubbed some people the wrong way, who call it “a constitutional violation of the Fourth Amendment protection against unlawful searches and seizures, an invasion of privacy and a likely lawsuit target.”

A week later after its introduction, a federal judge temporarily suspended the school from drug testing when the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Eastern Missouri filed suit on Sept. 14 on behalf of six students at Linn State Technical College.

Richard Pemberton, associate dean of Student Affairs, said results from a survey the school conducted show that hundreds of local employers are overwhelming supportive of a requirement which these same students will encounter in the job market.

Although it seems like the school is trying to prepare its students for something they will encounter when they have to go out in the world and use their skills to get a job, some people may not even be able to attend school to learn what they need to get a job in the first place with this policy.

If a student tests positive, they will be allowed to stay in school, but on probation, and must test clean after 45 days while also doing an online drug-prevention course. If they test negative the next time they are tested, they will remain on probation until the conclusion of the semester and will be subject to a random follow-up test.

Drugs are bad, but the consequences that people have to face, like probation or possible expulsion from school because of the abuse, shouldn’t coincide with their education. You can’t get very far in life without an education. Teachers, faculty members and adults who have already gone out into the job market know this—so why keep our generation of students and future generations from getting the same, or better opportunities?

Check Also

VSUPD Crime Blotter: Rumors and Suspicious Activity

Yik Yak users create sexual rumors on VSU campus  On April 3, 2024, at approximately ...

One comment

  1. Outstanding! This idea should be adopted by every school in the nation! In fact, lower schools should do it as well! Could you imagine if college was an environment without drug abusing idiots and filled only with people who want to learn? College with no people who come to get money from the government to buy, or sell, drugs. Sounds amazing, but it’ll never happen. Why? Because college can’t exist in the real world, where employers make you do drug testing, or, you know, you have to go to work (class) and not sit stoned in your room. It is a “violation of rights”!!! As for me, I pay for intramurals sports, but I don’t play them; I pay for a health facility I’ve used twice, since I rarely get sick; I pay for upkeep of athletic facilities I don’t use, I go to the gym and have better things to do than dedicate all my time to a sports team; I have also been paying for a parking deck I don’t use except when intramurals players (and their mommies and daddies) who aren’t even supposed to be parking on campus are filling up my dorm’s lot. I would be more than happy to pay fifty dollars and pee in a cup to prevent tax dollars from being wasted and get the druggies clean or kick them back where they belong, which is definitely not in a college society.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *